tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8351279220892449586.post4134735673327479993..comments2023-03-27T17:59:39.988-06:00Comments on Prairie Tester: Random Data toolAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16141468737761368754noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8351279220892449586.post-7853970707312371462013-10-03T06:28:05.975-06:002013-10-03T06:28:05.975-06:00Hey Jason,
Thank you for writing about TestSpicer...Hey Jason,<br /><br />Thank you for writing about TestSpicer. Right now TestSpicer is an interesting experiment and I am trying to gauge if people will find it useful or not. <br /><br />It's good to know that you found the concept useful. I am aware of the limitations you mentioned in the wrap-up and if enough people find it useful - we will cover them. <br /><br />BTW, just curious - did you use TestSpicer.com manually or did you use this tool as part of your automated tests?<br /><br />BTW, we have just included a fake SMTP server with the TestSpicer to make automated testing of emails easier. I am trying breadth first approach - will touch upon few interesting things and then will go deep to cover one data-point at a time.<br /><br />Feel free to reach out if you have any comments / feedback. Thanks, Anand.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15490592421160090273noreply@blogger.com